SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Raj) 179

D.C.DALELA
ASHOK KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.K.SHARMA, Madhav, Mitra

Judgment


D. C. DALELA, J.

( 1 ) ONE Ratanchand filed a complaint before the learned ACJM No. 3, Jaipur City, Jaipur, for taking action, against the accused-petitioners, for having committed offences u/ss 420, 467, 468, 471, 384, 453 and 120b, IPC. The learned Magistrate forwarded the complaint to the Police Station concerned, u/s. 156, Cr. P. C. A case was registered with the police. After the necessary investigation, the police found that the accused-petitioners have prima facie committed offences u/ss. 147,341 and 323, IPC and, therefore, a charge-sheet (challan) was submitted before the learned Magistrate. The learned Magistrate, on the same date, received the challan from the police, against the accused-petitioners. He took cognizance against them, for offences u/ss. 147,341 and 323, IPC. The substance of accusation was read over to them. They pleaded not guilty. The learned Magistrate proceeded to summon the prosecution witnesses, for the evidence. Now, the case is fixed for recording of the evidence on 17-2-1999. Feeling aggrieved thereby, this petition u/s. 482, Cr. P. C. has been preferred by the petitioners.

( 2 ) I have heard the arguments of both the sides.

( 3 ) THE m






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top