D.C.DALELA
ASHOK KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
D. C. DALELA, J.
( 1 ) ONE Ratanchand filed a complaint before the learned ACJM No. 3, Jaipur City, Jaipur, for taking action, against the accused-petitioners, for having committed offences u/ss 420, 467, 468, 471, 384, 453 and 120b, IPC. The learned Magistrate forwarded the complaint to the Police Station concerned, u/s. 156, Cr. P. C. A case was registered with the police. After the necessary investigation, the police found that the accused-petitioners have prima facie committed offences u/ss. 147,341 and 323, IPC and, therefore, a charge-sheet (challan) was submitted before the learned Magistrate. The learned Magistrate, on the same date, received the challan from the police, against the accused-petitioners. He took cognizance against them, for offences u/ss. 147,341 and 323, IPC. The substance of accusation was read over to them. They pleaded not guilty. The learned Magistrate proceeded to summon the prosecution witnesses, for the evidence. Now, the case is fixed for recording of the evidence on 17-2-1999. Feeling aggrieved thereby, this petition u/s. 482, Cr. P. C. has been preferred by the petitioners.
( 2 ) I have heard the arguments of both the sides.
( 3 ) THE m
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.