SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Raj) 39

A.K.SINGH
MANAK CHAND – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
HIMANSHU MAHESHVARI, R.S.RATHORE, Shambhu Rathore

Judgment


A. K. SINGH, J.

( 1 ) HEARD the learned Counsel for the petitioners, the learned Public Prosecuor and the learned Counsel for the non-petitioner No. 2.

( 2 ) BY this petition under Section 482 Cr. P. C. the petitioners have prayed that F. I. R. No. 78/96 registered at police station, Sumerpur be quashed.

( 3 ) ACCORDING to the averments made in the petition, respondent No. 2 Smt. Shobha was married to Shri Manak Chand (petitioner No. 1) on 28-1-1995. After their marrige the relations between Manak Chand and Smt. Shobha (respondent No. 2) became strained. As a result Smt. Shobha has filed a complaint against the petitioners in the Court of Judicial Magistrate Sumerpur alleging the commission of offences u/ss. 498a and 406, IPC. That complaint was forwarded by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sumerpur to the Station House Officer of the Police Station, Sumerpur under sub-section (3) of S. 156, Cr. P. C. for investigation. On receipt of the complaint, the Station House Officer of the Police Station registered the F. I. R. No. 5/96 in respect of offences u/ss. 493a and 406, IPC. During the course of investigation statements of several persons were recorded u/s. 161, Cr. P. C.






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top