SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Raj) 140

D.C.DALELA
VISHNU VEER – Appellant
Versus
HARI KISHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
RAKESH BHARGAVA, SANDIP MATHUR, TEJ PRAKASH SHARMA

Judgment


D. C. DALELA, J.

( 1 ) BOTH these appeals arise out of the same award and the same accident, therefore, they are decided by this common judgment.

( 2 ) IT is stated that the claimant Vishnu veer alias Bhola (appellant of S. B. Civil misc. Appeal No. 854 of 1994 and the respondent No. 1 in S. B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 1033 of 1994) and his other friends were standing near old bus station in Deeg, suddenly, bus No. RRA 2222 driven by Ramavtar (respondent No. 3 in s. B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 854 of 1994 and respondent No. 2 in S. B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 1033 of 1994) rashly and negligently hit the claimant due to which the claimant sustained grievous injuries and his right leg was amputated. The claimant filed a claim petition before the learned Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Deeg (for short the Tribunal ). The learned Tribunal vide its award dated 30. 5. 1994, awarded a total compensation of Rs. 1,52,000 against Hari Kishan and ramji Lal, owners of the bus (appellants in Appeal No. 1033 of 1994 and the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in Appeal No. 854 of 1994), but, fixed the liability of the insurance company (respondent No. 3 in Appeal no. 1033 of 1994 and respondent No. 4 i














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top