SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Raj) 593

J.C.VERMA
SUSHIL KUMAR SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
HANUMAN CHOUDHARY, SUSHIL JAIN

Judgment


J. C. VERMA, J.

( 1 ) THE writ petitioners are practising as registered Medical Practitioner on the basis of their a Class Registration. They all are qualified as B. A. M. S. (Bachelor of Ayurvedic and Medicines Surgery) as alleged. Even though in regard to certain writ petitioners there is difference of their academic qualification, however, the point involving in the case is whether the petitioners who are registered as Ayurvedic Medical Practitioners can be allowed to practise in Medicine profession in regard to other system of Medicine that is Homoeopathy or Allopathy. No order has been challenged, not any overt action has been alleged against any of the respondents. It is also not mentioned that their shops were checked or they were restrained from practising in system other than Ayurvedic or that they were challaned for violation of any Drugs Act or under any system of the mal-practise, but still the petitioners are apprehending that the respondents are likely to restrain the petitioners from practising in other system of medicine other than the system in which they are qualified and registered i. e. Ayurvedic.

( 2 ) THE written statement has been filed by respondent





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top