SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Raj) 63

P.P.NAOLEKAR
RAJMAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.D.Purohit, M.R.SINGHVI, M.S.SINGHVI, N.P.Gupta

Judgment


P. P. NAOLEKAR, J.

( 1 ) AS common questions of law and facts are involved in these petitions, they are decided by this common order.

( 2 ) IN village Mandafia Sanwaliyaji, there is a temple of Lord Krishna. The management of the temple and its properties is under the Board constituted under Shri Sanwalijaji Temple Act, 1992. A notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short the Act (hereinafter) was issued on 10-7-1996 and was published in the Rajasthan Gazette dated 27-7-1996 for acquisition of lands and buildings for extension of temple Shri Sanwaliyaji and for construction of temple premises. A notification under Section 4 (1) of the Act was published in the newspapers Pratah Kal published from Udaipur, dated 4-9-1996, Lalkar published from Chittorgarh dated 5-9-1996 and Rajasthan Kiran published from Nimbaheda dated 12-9-1996. A declaration under Section 6 read with Section 17 of the Act was published in Rajashtan Gazette dated 18-9-1996, in the newspapers ,jan Nayak dated 21-9-1996 and Rajasthan Patrika dated 9-10-1996. Notices under Section 9 of the Act were issued to some of the owners of the properties under acquisition.

( 3 ) IN view of








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top