SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Raj) 432

MOHD.YAMIN
BRIJKUMAR SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
CHANDRA LEKHA PARIHAR, M.D.PUROHIT

Judgment


MOHD. YAMIN, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a misc. petition under S. 482, Cr. P. C. against the order of learned Special Judge, Anti-Corruption cases, Udaipur passed on 6-9-1996 by which he framed charge under S. 409 read with S. 210-B, IPC and u/s. 5 (1) (d) (2) read with S. 5 (2) of Prevention of Corruption Act.

( 2 ) I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P. P.

( 3 ) THE case of the prosecution is that one Ramesh Chandra Dedor and petitioner were working in the Panchayat Samiti, Girwa. The petitioner was Vikas Adhikari while Ramesh Chandra was working as Jr. Engineer. Girwa was declared as a famine striken area and famine works commenced w. e. f. 20-5-88 which came to an end on 15-7-87 when a declaration was made that no more famine work should continue. In all a sanction of Rs. 1,60,000/- was given by the government to be spent for the famine work. Out of it Rs. 79,000/- was to be spent towards the materials and Rs. 81,000/- were sanctioned for famine relief work. It is said that upto 15-7-88 out of Rs. 81, 000/- sanctioned for labour purposes, a sum of Rs. 80,980/- was already spent but towards the purchase of materials a sum of Rs. 18,346. 74 was






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top