SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Raj) 611

B.R.ARORA, A.K.SINGH
TARA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
SUDESH CHAUDHARY – Respondent


Judgment


AMARESH KU. SINGH, J.

( 1 ) HEARD the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the respondent.

( 2 ) THIS appeal is directed against the judgment dated 27th Jan. , 1997 passed by the learned single Judge in S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4585/1997 Smt. Sudesh Chaudhary v. Civil Judge and another, whereby the writ petition filed by the respondent No. 1 Smt. Sudesh Chaudhary was allowed and the judgment dated 3rd October, 1996 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Rai Singh Nagar was set aside and the election of the respondent No. 1 was held to be valid, to the office of Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, 4 BLD. District Shri Ganganagar.

( 3 ) THE facts relevant for the disposal of this appeal may be summarised as below.

( 4 ) THE respondent No. 1 (petitioner) Smt. Sudesh Chaudhary contested the election of the Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, 4 B. L. D. district Shri Ganganagar. In the election there were four candidates, namely Smt. Sudesh Kumari (respondent No. 1), Smt. Tara Devi (appellant) Gurmail and Vinod Kumar. Smt. Sudesh Kumari secured highest number of votes and she was declared elected as the Sarpanch of the Gram Panchayat and a certificate to









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top