SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Raj) 923

MOHD.YAMIN
MAGAN ALIAS MAGNIA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.S.RATHOD, PRADIP SHAH

Judgment


MOHD. YAMIN, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a petition under Sec. 482 Cr. P. C. for giving effect to the various sentences on conviction passed by competent court to run concurrently.

( 2 ) I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor at length.

( 3 ) FOR the purpose of convenience, it may be stated that the accused petitioner was convicted in the following cases :-1. Regular Criminal Case No. 448/88 (State v. Magan and another) convicted for offences punishable under Sec. 457/75 and 380/75 IPC) and sentenced as under vide judgment dated 17-11-95 :- u/s. 457/75 IPC : One year S. I. and a fine of Rs. 500/ -. u/s. 380/75 IPC : One year S. I. and a fine of Rs. 500/-2. Regular Criminal Case No. 199/91 (State v. Magan) convicted for offence punishable under Sec. 379 IPC vide judgment dated 2-12-95 and sentenced to undergo one year S. I. 3. Regular Criminal Case No. 200/91 (State v. Magan) convicted for offence punishable under Sec. 379 IPC vide judgment dated 2-12-95 and sentenced to undergo one year S. I. 4. Regular Criminal Case No. 202/91 (State v. Magan) Convicted for offence punishable under Sec. 379 IPC vide judgment dated 20-11-95 and sente








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top