SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Raj) 281

A.K.SINGH
PRATAP SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Chandralekha, S.K.Vyas

Judgment

( 1 ) IN Criminal Case No. 9/82 State v. Pratap Singh and others pending before the learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bali, the learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate framed charges under S. 420, I. P. C. against the accused Gyandutt s/o. Shri Ram Swaroop Zha and Pratap Singh s/o. Shri Hari Ram Panwar. The charges were read over and explained, and plea of the accused was recorded on 8-1-87. The accused, thereafter, filed a Revision Petition in the Court of learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Bali. The Revision Petition was dismissed by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Bali by his order 23-4-92 on the ground that there was sufficient ground for framing the charge against the accused petitioners. Feeling aggrieved by the order passed by the learned District Sessions Judge, Bali, the accused persons have filed this petition under S. 482, Cr. P. C. on the ground that there are grounds to justify the framing of charge against them and prayed that the charge as well as subsequent proceedings be quashed under S. 482, Cr. P. C. The learned Public Prosecutor has opposed this petition. I have gone through the order dated 23-4-92 passed by the learned District and Sessions Judge, Bali, the





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top