SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Raj) 420

P.C.JAIN
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
AJMER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.L.KALA, P.P.CHAUDHARY, S.S.LAL

Judgment


P. C. JAIN, J.

( 1 ) THE appellants-defendant has filed this appeal under Sec. 39 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (for short the Act) against the judgment and decree passed by the learned- Addl. Distt. Judge No. 2, Jodhpur dated 15-1-96 in Civil Misc. Case No. 227/95.

( 2 ) THE dispute raised in this appeal is very short. The relevant facts are that a contract agreement No. CE/b/j/jodh/45/84 ,was executed between the parties of store accommodation at Banar, Jodhpur. The above agreement contained a provision for reference of the disputes arising between the parties in connection with the above work to an arbitrator. A dispute regarding water charges arose between the parties. , The dispute was referred to Shri S. G. Mahajan, the Sole Arbitrator. After hearing the parties, the Sole Arbitrator gave his award on 16-2-93. The notice of making the award was given by the arbitrator to the plaintiff-respondent. Under the above award, the arbitrator awarded a sum of Rs. 3,77,959/- to the respondent No. 1. He also awarded interest. However, no dispute has been raised regarding the interest. The appellant-defendant raised certain objections before the learned District Judge when the pro












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top