SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Raj) 765

S.C.MITAL
CHUNA RAM AND SIX – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.L.JASMATIA, M.L.Garg

Judgment


S. C. MITAL, J.

( 1 ) THE above named petitioners have filed this bail application under Section 439, Cr. P. C. in Sessions Case No. 89/96 pending in the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Nagaur Camp Deedwana pertaining to F. I. R. No. 94 dated 14-9-1995, Police Station Khunkhuna under Sections 302, 364, 365, 176 and 201 I. P. C. The learned Additional Sessions Judge Camp Deedwana has rejected the bail application of the petitioners. The petitioners moved first bail application No. 481/96 along with other co-accused persons, which was allowed to be withdrawn on the request with liberty to file a fresh bail application after the receipt of copies of the statements. The second bail application No. 1068/96 was rejected on 9-9-1996 along with Misc. Petition No. 26/96 under Section 482, Cr. P. C. challenging the orders dated 25-3-1996 and 26-3-1996 taking cognizance by learned Judicial Magistrate, Deedwana. Now the petitioners have moved this third bail application.

( 2 ) THE brief facts of the case are that Shri Sugan Singh son of Shri Bahadur Singh resident of village Badawara submitted a report on 14-9-1995 at Police Station, Khunkhuna that his son studying in 10th Class w











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top