SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Raj) 139

R.S.VERMA
KAILASH CHAND AGARWAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.C.Jam, SUMITRA GOYAL

Judgment


R. S. VERMA, J.

( 1 ) LOOKING to the short point involved, the revision petition has been heard finally at the admission stage itself with the consent of the parties.

( 2 ) THE petitioner has been convicted of offence under Section 379, I. P. C. , by the learned Judicial Magistrate, No. 10 Jaipur City, Jaipur, and has been ordered to undergo simple imprisonment for one year and six months vide judgment dated 18. 4. 1991. The petitioner went in appeal to learned Sessions Judge, Jaipur City, Jaipur, who made over the appeal to the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Special Judge, E. C. Act), Jaipur, for disposal. Learned Additional Sessions Judge dismissed the appeal and upheld the conviction and sentence passed against the petitioner by the learned trial Magistrate. Aggrieved petitioners has come to this Court by way of revision. I have heard the learned Counsel for the parties and have perused the record.

( 3 ) THE only evidence against the petitioner is that he was found travelling in a stolen car which was being driven by one Chiranjilal, co-accused. Chiranji Lal ran way with the car which was later on apprehended. Chiranji Lal was also tried for offence under Section





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top