SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Raj) 163

RAJENDRA SAXENA
BALAK RAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Judgment


SAXENA, J.

( 1 ) THE aforementioned represented appeal as well as the jail appeal have been preferred against the judgment dated 19-2-1987 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Raisingh Nagar in Sessions Case No. 39/ 85, whereby the appellant was found guilty for the offences under Section 302, IPC and Section 27, Indian Arms Act and sentenced to life imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 200 / - and in default to further undergo two months simple imprisonment under the first count and rigorous imprisonment for one year with a fine of Rs. 200 / -and in default to further undergo simple imprisonment for two months under the second count. It was also directed that both the substantive sentences shall run concurrently.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated the case of the prosecution is that PW 1 Lal Chand, who is a Pong Dam Oustee, was allotted in the year 1977 one murabba of agricultural land situated in chak 20 A. He had a son and five daughters. Appellant Balak Ram, who is an ex army presonnel, was married to Lal Chands eldest daughter DW 2 Smt. Kashmir Kaur. About seven years prior to the alleged incident, Lal Chand had given the said land to the appellant for cultivation. The appellant
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top