RAJENDRA SAXENA
BALAK RAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
SAXENA, J.
( 1 ) THE aforementioned represented appeal as well as the jail appeal have been preferred against the judgment dated 19-2-1987 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Raisingh Nagar in Sessions Case No. 39/ 85, whereby the appellant was found guilty for the offences under Section 302, IPC and Section 27, Indian Arms Act and sentenced to life imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 200 / - and in default to further undergo two months simple imprisonment under the first count and rigorous imprisonment for one year with a fine of Rs. 200 / -and in default to further undergo simple imprisonment for two months under the second count. It was also directed that both the substantive sentences shall run concurrently.
( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated the case of the prosecution is that PW 1 Lal Chand, who is a Pong Dam Oustee, was allotted in the year 1977 one murabba of agricultural land situated in chak 20 A. He had a son and five daughters. Appellant Balak Ram, who is an ex army presonnel, was married to Lal Chands eldest daughter DW 2 Smt. Kashmir Kaur. About seven years prior to the alleged incident, Lal Chand had given the said land to the appellant for cultivation. The appellant
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.