SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Raj) 494

High Court Of Rajasthan
Judgename : B.R.ARORA
HIMMAT SINGH - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN - Respondent
CRI. M. B. A. 2129 Of 1994
Decided On : 11/15/1994

Advocates Appeared:
Anand Purohit, B.S.BHATI

The police have the right to further investigate a case even after submitting a charge-sheet, and can submit a supplementary report under Section 173(8) Cr. P. C.

Headnote:

{'KEYWORD': 'NDPS Act - Bail - Charge-sheet - FSL Report', 'SUBJECT': 'Bail in NDPS Act cases', 'ACT SECTION LIST': ['Section 173(2) Cr. P. C.', 'Section 173(5) Cr. P. C.', 'Section 173(8) Cr. P. C.', 'Section 37 of the NDPS Act'], 'SUMMARY': 'The court held that the absence of an FSL report in a charge-sheet submitted under Section 173(2) Cr. P. C. does not render the charge-sheet incomplete or defective. The court also held that the police have the right to further investigate a case even after submitting a charge-sheet, and can submit a supplementary report under Section 173(8) Cr. P. C. The court further held that bail cannot be granted to an accused under Section 37 of the NDPS Act if there are reasonable grounds to believe that the accused is guilty of the offence.'}

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner was arrested in connection with an FIR lodged against him for offences under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. After his arrest, two Jericans of five litres each, containing acetic Anhydride, which is used for the manufacture of brown sugar, were recovered from his possession. The police submitted a charge-sheet against the petitioner under Section 173(2) Cr. P. C., but the FSL report was not included in the charge-sheet. The petitioner filed a bail application before the Sessions Judge, who dismissed the application. The petitioner then filed a bail application before the High Court.

Finding of the Court:

The High Court held that the charge-sheet submitted by the police was complete and in conformity with the provisions of Section 173(2) Cr. P. C., even though the FSL report was not included. The court also held that the police had the right to further investigate the case and submit a supplementary report under Section 173(8) Cr. P. C. The court further held that there were reasonable grounds to believe that the petitioner was guilty of the offences under the NDPS Act, and therefore, bail could not be granted to him under Section 37 of the Act.

Issues: 1. Whether the charge-sheet submitted by the police was incomplete or defective due to the absence of an FSL report? 2. Whether the police had the right to further investigate the case and submit a supplementary report? 3. Whether the petitioner was entitled to bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that the charge-sheet submitted by the police was complete and in conformity with the provisions of Section 173(2) Cr. P. C., even though the FSL report was not included. The court relied on the provisions of Section 173(5) Cr. P. C., which states that the investigating officer shall forward all documents or relevant extracts thereof on which the prosecution proposes to rely other than those already sent to the Magistrate during investigation. 2. The court held that the police had the right to further investigate the case and submit a supplementary report under Section 173(8) Cr. P. C. The court relied on the decision of the Supreme Court in Ram Lal Narang v. The State (Delhi Administration) (AIR 1979 SC 1791), which held that the right of the police to further investigate was not exhausted by the Magistrate taking cognizance of the offence. 3. The court held that there were reasonable grounds to believe that the petitioner was guilty of the offences under the NDPS Act, and therefore, bail could not be granted to him under Section 37 of the Act.

Final Decision: The High Court dismissed the petitioner's bail application.

Judgment


B. R. ARORA, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner, alongwith his wife and one Tapsu, was arrested in connection with an FIR lodged against them on 14-3-94 at Police Station, Pratabgarh, pertaining to the offences under Sections 8/12, 8/18, 25, 29, 8-A read with Sections 18 and 25a of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (in short, the Act ). After his arrest on 19-3-94, on his information and at his instance, two Jericans of five litres each, containing acetic Anhydride, which is one of the components in the manufacture of brown sugar, and some other materials were recovered from the possession of the petitioner in the presence of the Motbir witnesses. According to the prosecution, this acetic Anhydride, which is used for the manufacture of brown sugar, was supplied by the petitioner to the persons, including co-accused Tapsu, for manufacturing brown sugar. The police, after necessary investigation, submitted the charge-sheet against the accused under Section 173 (2) Cr. P. C. The learned Magistrate took cognizance and proceeded with the trial. The petitioner moved an application under Section 437 Cr. P. C. for the grant of bail before the learned Sessions Judge, Pratabgarh, who, by his order dated 20-7-94, dismissed the bail application filed by the petitioner by holding that at this stage it cannot he said that the petitioner is not guilty for the offence and, therefore, he cannot be released on bail in view of the provisions of Section 37 of the NDPS Act. It is against this order, rejecting the bail application filed by the petitioner, that the petitioner has moved this bail application and prayed for his release on bail during the pendency of the trial.

( 2 ) IT is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the police, while submitting the charge-sheet under Section 173 (2) Cr. P. C. , has not filed the FSL report and in the absence of the FSL report, it cannot be said that the articles recovered from the petitioner, can be covered under the provisions of the Act and in the absence of the FSL report, the charge-sheet submitted by the police cannot be said to be a charge-sheet as envisaged under Section 173 (2) Cr. P. C. and as such, as per the provisions of Section 167 (2), the petitioner is entitled to be released on bail. The learned Public Prosecutor, on the other hand, has submitted that the charge-sheet submitted by the police against the petitioner is a complete one and an additional document can he filed under Section 173 (8) Cr. P. C. and as the charge-sheet has been submitted against the accused-petitioner, the provisions of Section 167 (2) Cr. P. C. are not applicable in the case and the petitioner is not entitled to be released on bail.

( 3 ) I have considered the submission made by the learned counsel for the parties.

( 4 ) SECTION 173 deals with the report of police officer on completion of investigation. Sub-section (2) of Section 173 provides that as soon as the investigation is completed, the Officer Incharge of the Police Station shall forward to a Magistrate empowered to take cognizance of the offence on a police report, a report in the form prescribed by the State Government, stating the names of the parties; the nature of the information; the names of the persons who appear to be acquainted with the circumstances of the case; whether any offence appears to have been committed and, if so, by whom; whether the accused has been arrested, whether he has been released on his bond and, if so, whether with or without sureties; and whether he has been forwarded in custody under Section 170 Cr. P. C. and the action taken by him to the person, if any, by whom the information relating to the commission of the offence was first given. Sub-section (5) of Section 173 Cr. P. C. provides that along with the report, the investigating officer shall forward all documents or relevant extracts thereof on which the prosecution proposes to rely other than those already sent to the Magistrate du



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top