SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Raj) 290

High Court Of Rajasthan
Judgename : M.C.JAIN,R.S.VERMA
STATE OF RAJASTHAN - Appellant
Versus
SHER SINGH - Respondent
CRI. MURDER REF. 3 Of 1992
Decided On : 08/24/1993

The burden of proving the prosecution's case squarely rests upon the prosecution, and this burden never shifts to the accused. Motive in murder cases usually furnishes a clue to the identity of the murderer, and the absence of motive may be a pointer to the innocence of the accused.

Headnote:

MURDER - Conviction set aside - Acquitted of charge under Section 302, I. P. C. - Reference for confirmation of the death penalty rejected

Fact of the Case:

Sher Singh was convicted of the offence under Section 302, I. P. C. for committing twin murders of his wife Kartaro and his son Nanak. The prosecution alleged that Sher Singh, armed with a gun and an axe, attacked Nanak and Kartaro, resulting in their deaths. The prosecution's case was based on the testimony of witnesses and the recovery of blood-stained items. The trial court found the defence story unworthy of credit and convicted and sentenced Sher Singh. The defence contended that the trial judge's approach was faulty and urged that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the murders occurred as alleged. The court highlighted discrepancies in the prosecution's evidence, including conflicting witness testimonies, lack of motive, and suspicious conduct during the investigation. The court also criticized the trial judge for his approach and concluded that there was a good deal of reasonable doubt regarding Sher Singh's guilt.

Issues: The key issues in the case included the reliability of witness testimonies, the conduct of the investigation, the presence of motive, and the veracity of the prosecution's case.

Ratio Decidendi: The burden of proving the prosecution's case squarely rests upon the prosecution, and this burden never shifts to the accused. The court emphasized that the prosecution must stand on its own leg and that the trial judge should have first examined the prosecution's case before considering the defence version. The court also highlighted the importance of motive in murder cases and the need to establish it as a clue to the identity of the murderer.

Final Decision: The court set aside Sher Singh's conviction and acquitted him of the charge under Section 302, I. P. C. The reference for confirmation of the death penalty was rejected, and Sher Singh was ordered to be set at liberty forthwith, if not required in any other case.

Judgment


VERMA, J.

( 1 ) LEARNED Additional Sessions Judge, Raisinghnagar has found guilty Sher Singh of offence under Section 302, I. P. C. for committing twin murders, one of his wife Kartaro and the other of his son Nanak. The learned Judge has imposed upon the convict the extreme penalty of death. He has made D. B. Criminal Reference No. 3/1992 for confirmation of the death sentence. Convict Sher Singh has filed D. B. Criminal Jail Appeal No. 387/ 1992, Whereby he challenges the correctness and legality of his conviction and the sentence passed upon him. The murder reference and the jail appeal have been heard together and are being disposed of by a common judgment.

( 2 ) THE prosecution story is that Sher Singh was resident of village PM I. Smt. Kartaro was his legally wedded wife and Nanak Ram was his son. Nanak Ram was married to Smt. Veero (P. W. 2 ). Sher Singh owned about 25 bighas of land at village PM I. Three years prior to the alleged occurrence, Sher Singh divided his land and gave 10 bighas of the same to Nanak Ram and retained the remaining land with him. Sher Singh and Nanak Ram started separate cultivation of the two parcels of land. The appellant used to reside in a Dhani built on this land. On being separated, Nanak Ram built a separate Dhani on the land given to him and Nanak Ram and his wife Veero, (P. W. 2) aforesaid started living separately from Sher Singh in this newly constructed Dhani. Sher Singh and his wife Kartaro did not enjoy good relations and hence Kartaro started living with her son and dauther-in-law on the new Dhani built by her son.

( 3 ) THE prosecution case is that Veero (P. W. 2) originally belonged to village 7 KND, where her parents used to live with their family. Veero was pregnant during the relevant period. Hence, on 7-6-1991 her mother Dhanno (P. W. 5) and brothers Dayal Ram (P. W. 3) and Pilla Ram. (P. W. 4) had come to visit her at village PM I. They had an overnight stay at the place of Veero. On the morning of 8-6-91 at about 7 a. m. Sher Singh came to the Dhani of Nanak Ram. Sher Singh was armed with a gun and also carried an axe. Veero was preparing tea at that time while Nanak Ram, Dhanna, Dayala Ram, Pilla Ram and Kartaro were sitting nearby. Sher Singh all of a sudden fired gunshots at Nanak Ram, killing him on the spot. He, then inflicted axe blows on Kartaro who fell down and started bleeding. Veero and her mother and brothers raised an alarm but nobody came there. Sher Singh, thereafter, walked , away towards his Dhani, with gun and axe in his hands.

( 4 ) THE prosecution story further is that Veero along with Dayala Ram went the same day to Police Station Rawla at a distance of 15 kilometres and lodged an oral report with S. H. O. Premnath (P. W. 7) at about 11 a. m. Shri Premnath got the report Ex. D. 1 recorded and registered a case under Sections 302-307, I. P. C. He recorded the statement of Smt. Veero and proceeded to the scene of occurrence along with a photographer and Dr. Balwant Singh. He got the scene of occurrence photo graphed. He, then inspected the site and prepared site plan Ex. P-5. He found the dead body of Nanak lying in the aangan of latters dhani. He examined the dead body and prepared memo Ex. P-6 and Panchnama Ex. P-7 in the regard Smt. Kartaro was also lying nearby in an injured condition. Premnath recovered bloodstained and control soil from the spot and sealed them separately vide memos Ex. P-8 and Ex. P-9 Dr. Balwant Singh conducted autopsy on the dead body of Nanak at the spot, the same day at 1 p. m. He found as many as six wound of entry of gun pellets on the body of deceased Nanak Ram and an equal number of wounds of exit, details whereof were noted by him in the post-mortem report Ex. P-1. He found the following injuries on Nanaks person. 1. Lacerated wound (Entrance)3x2x2cm. on Rt. iliac fossa near symphysis margin inverted no blackening, no tattooing No signing of hair, Runs, obliquely downward through inguinal canal in it. side of






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top