SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Raj) 343

R.S.VERMA, R.P.SAXENA
NARAIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.R.MEHTA, D.S.Shishodia, H.L.KELA, HEMANT CHAUDHARY, SHANKER MAL SINGHVI

Judgment

( 1 ) THE four writ petitions, particulars whereof have been given in the Schedule annexed hereto, raise identical questions of law and facts, and hence, have been heard together and are being disposed of by a common order. As illustrative of facts of all the cases, we may briefly narrate the facts of the D. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1328/89 (Narain v. State of Rajasthan and others ).

( 2 ) UNDER Rule 17 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue (Allotment of Land for Agricultural Purposes) Rules, 1970 (for short the Rules of 1970) read with provisions of Rajasthan Imposition of Ceiling on Agricultural Hold-ings Rules, 1973 (for short the Rules of 1973), the Allotting Authority (S. D. O. , Begun) proceeded to make allotment of excess ceiling land in favour of the petitioner. A meeting was fixed for this purpose on 3-6-1981, at which besides the S. D. O. , two members of the Advisory Committee namely Tehsildar, Begun and Sarpanch, Avalheda were also present. Since three members of the Advisory Committee were not present and the quorum was incomplete, the meeting was adjourned to 3 p. m. the same day. At the adjourned meeting, again the Allotting Au-thority and two members of the Advis

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top