SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Raj) 353

N.L.TIBREWAL
BAL KISHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.K.RANA, M.K.KAUSHIK, M.RAFIQ

Judgment


N. L. TIBREWAL, J.

( 1 ) HEARD. The petitioner is being required in a criminal case on the allegation of smuggling silver and gold. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the officials of the Excise Department want to harass the petitioner, as such, he should be granted prearrest bail.

( 2 ) FROM the order of the learned sessions Judge, it does not appear that there is no evidence against the petitioner - at this stage. I am of the view that the Investigating Agency should be free in investigating such matters which seriously effect the economy of the country. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner that he has duty paid slip in his possession about gold, can also be produced before the Investigating Agency.

( 3 ) IN my view, no case the pre-arrest bail U/s. 438 Cr. P. C. is made out. The application is rejecte

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top