SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Raj) 209

D.L.MEHTA
ROLAND MARKAS GOONTHAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Judgment


D. L. MEHTA, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the judgment dated 24th May 1988.

( 2 ) LEARNED Additional Sessions Judge, No. 2, Ajmer, convicted the present appellant under section 20-B of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act ).

( 3 ) PROSECUTION story unfolded during the trial is that 160 grams of Tcharas was recovered from the person of the present appellant. Hanuman Singh, P. W. 8, - received the information that a foreigner is selling the drugs and he is sitting nearby the Gujaron-ka-Shamsan. He proceeded with the police party consisting of P. W. 2 Guman Singh, P. W. 3, Jagdish Prasad, P. W. 4 Mooldan, P. W. 5 Jagdish Prasad, son of Radha Kishan. P. W. 6 Banshidhar and P. W. 7, Madan Singh. It is alleged that search of the present appellant was taken in the presence of Gureharan Singh, P. W. 1. Seizure memo Ex. P. 1 was prepared on the spot and the accused-appellant was arrested. The First Information Report of the occurrence was lodged at the Police Station just within an hour. The articles seized were also deposited in Maklhana and Ex. P. 3 has been produced to show that charast which was seized has been dep








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top