SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Raj) 86

J.R.CHOPRA
NAURAT MAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.C.Bhansali, M.M.Singhvi, T.S.CHAMPAVAT

Judgment


J. R. CHOPRA, J.

( 1 ) THIS petition arises under sections 482/397 Cr. P. C. against the order of the learned Munsif and Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Gulabpura by which he has taken cognizance against the accused under s. 406 I. P. C.

( 2 ) THE facts necessary to be noticed for the decision of this petition briefly stated are: that a complaint was filed before the S. H. O. Badnore by one Rahimudeen that he has given his tractor on rent to the accused-petitioner Rs. 100/- per day with this condition that the accused-petitioner will bear the expenses of the driver, diesel and repairs etc. , and he will pay him Rs. 100/- but the petitioner has not paid him that amount and when the arrears of the rent were demanded, the petitioner has taken the plea that he has already purchased the tractor but no written document was executed between the parties to evidence the sale and, therefore, the accused has fralldulently retained the possession of the tractor, trolly, and cultivator etc. After investigation, the investigating officer came to the conclusion that actually, the tractor has been sold to Naurat Mal for a sum of Rs. 26, and on different dates, he has paid Rs. 10,000/-




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top