SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Raj) 104

N.M.KASLIWAL
KEWAL CHAND NAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.L.Sharma, K.S.RATHORE, S.B.MATHUR

Judgment


N. M. KASLIWAL, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed, challenging the order dt. 8th April, 1983, passed by Avar Sachiv (Janch) Gramin Vikas Evam Panchayati Raj Department, Rajasthan Jaipur, suspending the petitioner from the post of Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Memasar, Panchayat Samiti Sri Dungargarh, District Churu. The petitioner was elected Sarpanch of the above-mentioned Panchayat on 10th December, 1981.

( 2 ) THE case of the petitioner is that on a complaint filed by one Dana Ram Choudhary, a challan has been filed against the petitioner on 11th March, 1982. under Sections 467, 471, and 408 IPC in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Churu. In view of the aforesaid criminal proceedings lodged against the petitioner, the State Government has suspended the petitioner under Section 17 (4a) of the Rajasthan Panchayat Act, 1953 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ). The short controversy raised by the petitioner in this writ petition is that under Section 17 (4a) of the Act the State Government could have suspended the petitioner only when criminal proceedings in regard to an offence involving moral turpitude were pendi





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top