1981 Supreme(Raj) 76
High Court Of Rajasthan
Judgename : M.C.Jain
MAHESH TRANSPORT CO. - Appellant
Versus
R.T.A.JODHPUR - Respondent
Civil Misc. Writ Petn. 1358 Of 1980
Decided On : 07/02/1981
B.L.MAHESHWARI, R.R.VYAS
The Regional Transport Authority has the power to extend the date for receipt of applications for stage carriage permits under Section 57(2) of the Motor Vehicles Act.
Headnote:
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT - SECTION 57(2) AND (3) - EXTENSION OF DATE FOR RECEIPT OF APPLICATIONS - POWER OF REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY - INTERPRETATION.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner challenged the Regional Transport Authority's decision to consider belated applications received in response to a second notification extending the deadline for submitting applications for stage carriage permits.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the Regional Transport Authority had the power to extend the date for receipt of applications under Section 57(2) of the Motor Vehicles Act and that the second notification was valid.
Issues: Whether the Regional Transport Authority had the power to extend the date for receipt of applications for stage carriage permits.
Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted Section 57(2) and (3) of the Motor Vehicles Act and found that Subsection (2) confers the power of appointing the date for the receipt of applications on the Regional Transport Authority and that this power can be exercised more than once. Subsection (3) provides the procedure for dealing with applications after they are received, but it does not curtail the power of appointment of the date vested in the Regional Transport Authority.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the petition and upheld the Regional Transport Authority's decision to consider the belated applications.
M. C. JAIN, J.
( 1 ) THE petitioner in this writ petition has sought a prayer restraining the Regional Transport Authority, Jodhpur, from considering the belated applications received in pursuance of the notification published in the Rajasthan Rajpatra dt. 13-3-1980 along with the petitioners application and other applications which had been received in pursuance of the Gazette Notification dt. 20-12-1979.
( 2 ) THE facts of the present case lie in a very narrow compass. The Regional Transport Authority, Jodhpur, after fixing the scope of four stage carriages to perform two return services over the route Gachipura to Ajmer had invited applications for grant of four non-temporary stage carriage permits. The applications were invited through a Gazette Notification dt. 20-12-1979 (Annexure P/1), in which it was notified that the interested persons must file the application within a period of 30 days from the date of the publication. In pursuance of the Notification Annexure P/l the petitioner and three others submitted their applications on 27-12-1979. However, the Regional Transport Authority issued another notification published in the Rajasthan Rajpatra dt. 133-1980. (Annexure P/3), wherein the time for presentation of application was further extended up to 30 days from the date of the publication of the second notification i. e. Annexure P/3. In pursuance of the notification dt. 7-2-1980 published on 13-3-1980 (Annexure P/3) further nine applications were submitted, as would be evident from the Notification dt. 1-5-1980 (Annexure P/4), published in Rajasthan Gazette dt. 9-6-1980. The only grievance of the petitioner is that only those applications which have been received by the Regional Transport Authority in pursuance of the first notification could be considered and the applications which have been received in pursuance of the second notification could not be considered simultaneously along with the applications received in pursuance of the first notification. The applications according to the petitioner submitted after the expiry of the 30 days from the date of publication of the first notification are liable to be rejected and cannot be considered by the Regional Transport Authority along with the petitioners application and the applications of three others,
( 3 ) RETURN to the writ petition has been filed by the Regional Transport Authority in which it has been stated that the first notification published in the Gazette dt. 20-12-1979 was out on 15-1-1980 and thereafter it was despatched to subscribers. The late despatch ,was on account of disruption caused by stride. The said Gazette was received in the office of Regional, Transport Officer, Jodhpur after 20-1-1980 and even in the High Court Library, it was received on 23-1-1980. This return is accompanied with an affidavit of Shri Daulat Raj Bhandari, District Transport Officer (Writs) with a copy of the letter of the Director, Printing and Stationary Department, Jaipur. The non-petitioner Bachraj Singh has also filed a reply on the main points.
( 4 ) I have heard learned counsel for the parties.
( 5 ) THE only question which arises for consideration in this writ petition is as to whether the applications of non-petitioners Nos. 2 to 9, who filed their applications in pursuance of the second notification could be considered along with the applications which were submitted in pursuance of the first notification. Shri R. R. Vyas learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the resolution of the above controversy hinges on the proper construction of Sub-sections (2) and (3) of Section 57 of the Motor Vehicles Act. Sub-section (2) and relevant part of Sub-section (3) of Section 57 of the M. V. Act are reproduced hereunder for facility of reference:-Section 57. Procedure in applying for and granting permits-- (1 ). . . . . .
(2) An application for a stage carriage permit or a public carriers permit shall be made not less than six weeks before the date on