SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(Raj) 148

G.M.LODHA
RAMCHAND – Appellant
Versus
LAXMIKUMAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.I.KHAN, M.M.Nagayach, P.C.JAIN, Shanker Birmiwal

Judgment


G. M. LODHA, J.

( 1 ) HEARD learned counsel for the parties. In this case the defendant-petitioner has filed this revision application under Section 115 C. P. C. against the order dated 27-4-1979. On this date the defendant wanted to examine one more witness Shiv Kumar in spite of the fact that on an earlier date of hearing, he had mentioned before the court that he wants to examine now Kajod only. An oral prayer was made for examining Shiv Kumar on 4-4-79 but the same was rejected.

( 2 ) THE order-sheet dated 4-4-79 is as under. . (Text in Hindi not Printed ). .

( 3 ) ON 4-4-79 the evidence of the defendant was also closed after Kajod was examined, then the prayer to examine Shiv Kumar was rejected.

( 4 ) THE order-sheet of 4-4-79 shows that the defendant moved an application for examination of Shiv Kumar even after his evidence was closed and oral request was rejected. The court fixed this application for arguments on 27-4 79.

( 5 ) NO revision has been filed against the order dated 4-4-79 by which the evidence of defendant has been closed and the oral request of defendant to examine Shiv Kumar was rejected. That order has become final so far as the present revision













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top