SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(Raj) 127

M.C.JAIN
CHANDANMAL – Appellant
Versus
RAWATMAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Gopal Raj Singhvi, H.M.PAREKH

Judgment


M. C. JAIN, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a defendants appeal against the judgment and preliminary decree passed by the District Judge, Balotra, Shri B. C. Ojha on 30-9-67 modifying the preliminary decree passed by Shri R. L. Gupta, Civil Judge, Balotra on 30-1-67 in Civil Suit No. 146/1956 for the sale of the mortgage property. The Civil Judge passed the preliminary decree for Rs. 400 as principal amount and Rs. 262 on account of interest, in all for Rs. 662, whereas the learned District Judge disbelieving the plea of payment of Rs. 2,100 towards principal and Rupees 350 towards interest, decreed the plaintiffs suit in toto for a sum of Rupees 2,500 as principal amount and Rupees 800 as interest, total Rs. 3,300.

( 2 ) THE case has a chequered career or history. In order to appreciate the points of controversy arising in this appeal, it would be necessary to state a few facts in chronological order.

( 3 ) THE plaintiff Rawatmal instituted a suit for sale of the mortgage property in the Court of Civil Judge, Balotra on 22-5-56 alleging that the defendant chandanmal mortgaged his house described in para 1 of the plaint on Kartik sudi 14,samvat 2006, corresponding to 23-11-50 for a sum

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top