SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Raj) 141

M.L.JOSHI
D. C. JAIN – Appellant
Versus
UNIVERSITY OF JODHPUR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.L.AGARWAL, L.R.Mehta

Judgment


M. L. JOSHI, J.

( 1 ) BY this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner challenges the validity of the appointment of non-petitioner No. 3 Dr. S. Divakaran as Professor Structural Engineering, Dean Faculty of Engineering and his nomination to the Syndicate in the capacity of Dean and prays for quashing the same. It has also been prayed that the petitioner be declared entitled to be nominated to the Syndicate instead.

( 2 ) THE case of the petitioner as set up in the writ petition, briefly stated, is as follows:--

( 3 ) THE petitioner was authorised to exercise the powers of Dean of Faculty of law by the Vice Chancellors order dated 8-10-1974 till further orders. The petitioner alleges that this order did not meet the requirement of Statute 4 (1), and was rather made with malice and bias which the Vice Chancellor bore against him as he did not like to nominate the petitioner on the Syndicate. The petitioner further avers that under Statute 4 of the University Statutes (in brief statutes) two members were to be nominated from the Deans of Faculties by rotation in the order given in paragraph 6 of the writ petition. The Vice chancellor nominated Pro







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top