KAN SINGH
HIRANAND – Appellant
Versus
UMAID RAJ – Respondent
KAN SINGH, J.
( 1 ) THIS is a tenants second appeal directed against the appellate judgment and decree of the learned Additional District Judge No. 2, Jodhpur, ordering the tenants eviction from the suit premises.
( 2 ) THE eviction from the suit Premises was sought on the ground of bona fide personal necessity of the landlord. The tenant resisted the suit. This gave rise to the following four issues:-
1. Whether the plaintiff has bona fide and reasonable necessity for the house and it is necessary for him to get the house evicted? 2. Whether the defendant is a habitual defaulter? 3. Whether the expenses for light and water were included in the rent? 4. Whether the notice is invalid?
An application was made by the tenant in the trial Court for the determination of the rent and by its order dated 17-2-1969 the learned Munsiff determined the rent at Rs. 1,090/ -. The tenant was directed to pay this rent as also the future rent. However, as the tenant had only paid Rs. 1,000/- and not the full amount of Rs. 1. 090/- the learned Munsiff struck off the defence of the tenant on the application made by the landlord. The plaintiff-landlord appeared in his evidence. The tenant want
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.