SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(Raj) 83

R.D.GATTANI
MALURAM HEMRAJ – Appellant
Versus
ARJUN SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.L.Kachhara, L.R.Mehta, PUKHRAJ

Judgment


R. D. GATTANI, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner Maluram was allotted 15 Bighas of agricultural land by the colonisation Department, Government of Rajasthan. According to him on 15-51964 he executed a general power of attorney in favour of respondent Arjun Singh who without his power on 10-1-1967 executed a sale-deed in respect of the agricultural land allotted to the petitioner in favour of the sons of respondent No. 1, and even the sale price i. e. Rs. 23,500/- mentioned in the sale deed was not given to the petitioner. According to the petitioner the market price of the disputed land at the time of the filing of the suit was Rs. 45,000/ -. The petitioner, therefore, brought a suit in forma pauperis in the Court of Addl. District Judge, Sri Ganganagar on 10-1-1970 for the cancellation of the sale-deed and possession of the land in dispute; in the alternative for the payment of Rupees 45,000/- to him from the defendants.

( 2 ) THE application of the petitioner for permission to sue in forma pauperis was opposed by the defendants, who alleged that the petitioner had sufficient means to pay the court-fees. It was further alleged that the petitioner did not disclose in the Schedule a










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top