V.P.TYAGI
CHUNNILAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
V. P. TYAGI, J.
( 1 ) IN all these review petitions, which are directed against the judgment of this court in a writ matter, objection has been raised by the office that these review petitions have been filed with a Court-fee stamp of Rs. 2/- each whereas according to the provisions of Article 5, Schedule I of the Rajas than Court-fees Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) application for review should bear one-half of the fee payable on the writ petition.
( 2 ) THE contention of the petitioners is that the provisions of Article 11 (s) of schedule II of the Act would apply for determining the question of payment of court-fees in this matter.
( 3 ) NOTICE about this petition was given to the Government Advocate. Learned deputy Government Advocate urged that the the correct provision of the Court-fees Act would be Schedule I, Article 5 which provides that applications for review of judgment shall be presented in the Court on 1/2 of the fee payable on the plaint or memorandum of appeal comprising the relief sought in the application for review. He further contended that the word plaint used in this article must, on the basis of analogy, be taken to mean the writ petition
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.