SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(Raj) 63

V.P.TYAGI
CHUNNILAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.C.Bhansali, D.C.SHARMA

Judgment


V. P. TYAGI, J.

( 1 ) IN all these review petitions, which are directed against the judgment of this court in a writ matter, objection has been raised by the office that these review petitions have been filed with a Court-fee stamp of Rs. 2/- each whereas according to the provisions of Article 5, Schedule I of the Rajas than Court-fees Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) application for review should bear one-half of the fee payable on the writ petition.

( 2 ) THE contention of the petitioners is that the provisions of Article 11 (s) of schedule II of the Act would apply for determining the question of payment of court-fees in this matter.

( 3 ) NOTICE about this petition was given to the Government Advocate. Learned deputy Government Advocate urged that the the correct provision of the Court-fees Act would be Schedule I, Article 5 which provides that applications for review of judgment shall be presented in the Court on 1/2 of the fee payable on the plaint or memorandum of appeal comprising the relief sought in the application for review. He further contended that the word plaint used in this article must, on the basis of analogy, be taken to mean the writ petition








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top