SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(Raj) 22

C.M.LODHA
BANSHILAL – Appellant
Versus
NOOR MOHAMMAD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.L.Mehta, D.S.Shishodia

Judgment


C. M. LODHA, J.

( 1 ) THESE two appeals can be conveniently disposed of by a single judgment as they arise out of the same order.

( 2 ) THE facts giving arise to these appeals may be stated within a narrow compass as the facts on which the decision of these appeals turn are not in dispute,

( 3 ) THE appellant Banshilal filed a suit for eviction and arrears of rent against the respondent Noor Mohammad and one Heera-lal in the Court of Civil Judge, bhilwara which was dismissed on 8-2-1967. Aggrieved by the judgment and decree passed by the learned Civil Judge, Bhilwara Banshilal filed an appeal in the court of District Judge, Bhilwara. During the pendency of the appeal the respondent Noor Mohammad submitted the alleged written agreement between the parties Ex. A1 dated 11-9-1967 and by an application prayed that the appeal be dismissed. This application was opposed by the appellant Banshilal on the ground that the suit had not been adjusted wholly or in part by any lawful agreement or compromise, and it was therefore prayed that the appeal may be decided on merits. The learned District Judge, however, by his order dated 21-41969 came to the conclusion that the relationship









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top