SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(Raj) 117

V.P.TYAGI, KAN SINGH
SAMPAT RAJ – Appellant
Versus
LADU RAM – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.M.PAREKH, H.N.KALLA

Judgment


TYAGI, J.

( 1 ) THIS special appeal has been filed by plaintiff Sampat Raj under Section 18 of the Rajasthan High Court Ordinance end Order 43, Rule 1 (w) of the Code of Civil procedure and is directed against the order of a learned single Judge of this Court dated 31st August, 1966 whereby the learned Judge granted the review application of the defendants-respondents and set aside his previous judgment dated 22nd February, 1966 passed in a second appeal filed by the defendants before this Court.

( 2 ) LEARNED counsel for the respondents has raised a preliminary objection that the appeal before the D. B. is not maintainable under Section 18 of the Rajasthan High court Ordinance as the appellant has failed to obtain a certificate of fitness under section 18 (2) of the Ordinance from the learned Judge.

( 3 ) MR. Hasti Mal appearing on behalf of the appellant has urged that the present appeal has been filed by him under Sub-section (1) of Section 18 of the Rajasthan high Court Ordinance read with Order 43 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure which provides an appeal to the D. B. against, the order of the learned single judge of this Court. He also argued that the learned s












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top