SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(Raj) 262

I.N.MODI
MOHRILAL – Appellant
Versus
BALLABH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Prakash Chander Mathur, Roshanlal Maheshwari

Judgment


I. N. MODI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a civil regular second appeal by the defendant Mohrilal in a suit for dissolution of partnership and rendition of accounts, which was dismissed by the trial court but on appeal that decision was reversed and the case was remanded back with a direction that a preliminary decree for the taking of the accounts be passed and the suit be decided according to law. The material facts are these:

( 2 ) THE plaintiff Shri Ballabh and his brother Ram Raghunath carried on business in the name and style of Shri Ballabh Ram Raghunath at Sambhar. The defendant mohrilal also carried on business in the name of Shivnarain Mohrilal in the same town. On Jeth Sudi 6 Smt. 2006 equivalent to the 13th May, 1950, the plaintiffs and the defendant entered into a partnership agreement by which they agreed to carry on the business of sale and purchase of gur, sugar, potatoes, tobacco, etc. It is unnecessary for the purposes of the present appeal to set out all the conditions agreed to between the parties at the time of the agreement, and it should suffice to mention that the partnership business was to consist of the sale and purchase of tobacco among other articles referr











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top