SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(Raj) 213

JAGAT NARAYAN
SACHIDA NAND – Appellant
Versus
MANGI LAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Chand Mal Lodha, D.P.GUPTA

Judgment


JAGAT NARAYAN, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a miscellaneous appeal under Order 43, Rule 1 (ii), C. P. C. against a judgment of the Senior Civil Judge, Gangapur remanding a. suit under Order 41, rule 23 C. P C

( 2 ) ONE Ram Chander was the owner of a shop. Ram Chanders descendants formed a joint Hindu family and owned this shop in undivided shares. Ghisa and his sons owned half share in this undivided shop which was sold in execution of a decree of Johrilal at an auction sale. This half undivided share of the shop was purchased by Ghudmal. A sale certificate was issued in his favour on 14-8-39 and symbolic possession was delivered to him under Order 21, Rule 35 (2) and Order 21. Rule 96 on 11-9-39 Ghudmals sons Mangi Lal and Prahalad Kumar instituted the present suit for partition of the shop and for delivery of possession to them over their half share after partition on 22-7 59 Kanchan and Manohari who owned one-fourth of the shop and Sachida Nand and Babulal who owned one fourth were impleaded is defendants. They contested the suit inter alia on the ground that it was barred by limitation the trial court accepted this plea and dismissed the suit Against that decree the plaintiffs pre













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top