SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(Raj) 71

JAGAT NARAYAN
RATAN CHAND – Appellant
Versus
PANCHAYAT SAMITI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.C.Kasliwal, H.C.Jain, J.K.Jain, Raj Narain

Judgment


JAGAT NARAYAN, J.

( 1 ) THESE are sixteen connected writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution for a number of reliefs in regard to the tax on money lending imposed by the panchayat Samiti, Sojat, on the petitioners. The petitions have been contested on behalf of the respondents.

( 2 ) SECTION 33 (2) (i) of the Rajasthan Panchayat Samitis and Zilla Parishads Act, 1959 empowers the Panchayat Samiti to impose and levy in the prescribed manner a tax on such trades, callings, professions and industries as may be prescribed. The Rajasthan Panchayat Samitis Taxation Rules 1960 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules) were framed prescribing the manner of imposition and levy of taxes. The schedule attached to these Rules prescribes the trades, callings, professions and industries on which tax may be imposed and also lays down the maximum rate per annum of such tax. The maximum tax leviable on money lenders is Rs 200 per annum.

( 3 ) ON 19-9-61 the Panchayat Samiti passed a resolution under Rule 3 of the Rules proposing to impose a tax on money lenders at the following rates : -

(12) Income Rs. 1,000 to Rs. 5,000 rs. 100 P. A.

(13) Income Rs. 5,000 to Rs. 10,000 rs. 150


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top