SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(Raj) 173

I.N.MODI, B.P.BERI
BHANWARI LAL – Appellant
Versus
SHYAMLAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Harak Lal Manihar

Judgment


MODI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an execution appeal by a judgment-debtor against an order of the district Judge, Jodhpur, dated the 3rd of August, 1962, dismissing an application under Order XXI, Rule 90, Code of Civil Procedure in circumstances presently to be mentioned.

( 2 ) RESPONDENTS Nos. 3 and 4 Kanmal and Chandmal had obtained a decree against the appellant Bhanwarilal for enforcement of a mortgage. Respondent No. 2 Brij kishore is an assignee of that decree. The house under mortgage was put to auction in execution of the decree, and respondent No. 1 Shyamlal Goyal purchased it. The appellant moved an application under Order 21, Rule 90, Code of Civil Procedure alleging that there were certain irregularities and illegalities in the publishing and the conducting of the sale and, therefore, the same be set aside. Issues were framed by the executing Court on the 13th of July, 1962 and had presumably been set down for trial, when an objection was raised that the other issues need not be tried, and the issue relating to res judicata be taken up first as that would go to the root of the whole matter. The result was that the learned Judge heard arguments on that issue and came to
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top