JAGAT NARAYAN
FIRM SHAH CHANDANMAL FATEHRAJ – Appellant
Versus
HAZARILAL – Respondent
JAGAT NARAYAN, J.
( 1 ) THIS is a revision application by the defendants against an appellate order of the senior Civil Judge, Baran, holding that the Court of Munsif Baran has jurisdiction to try the suit.
( 2 ) HAZARI Lal plaintiff is a resident of Baran. Bhanwarlal and Mishrimal defendants carry on business at Merta under the name aad style Shah Chandanmal Fatehraj. The plaintiff placed a "bilticut" order with the defendants for the purchase of a wagon load of wheat to be booked for Bangalore. The defendants asked the plaintiff to send an advance and drew a Hundi Ex. 12 on him for a sum of Rs. 1500/ -. This Hundi was presented for payment to the plaintiff through a bank at baran on 4-8-54 and was duly honoured. The defendants consigned a wagon lead of wheat for Bangalore and sent the railway receipt with Beejak Ex. 9 and Hundi ex. 13 for Rs. 7,750/- the full price of the wheat at "bilticut rate, drawn on the plaintiff to the latter through the bank at Baran. By then the defendants had not received intimation about the payment on the earlier Hundi. It was however noted on the Beejak that if the sum of Rs. 1500/- had already been paid then it would be accounted for in th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.