SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(Raj) 216

SARJOO PROSAD, J.S.RANAWAT, D.S.DAVE
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Appellant
Versus
RANJITA LADHURAM – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMICUS CURIAE, P.N.DATT, Raj Narain

Judgment


SARJOO PROSAD, C. J.

( 1 ) A Division Bench of this Court has referred the following points for decision by the Full Bench :

"whether the authorities of this Court in (i) Dhokalsingh v. State, ILR (1953) 3 Raj 762 and (ii) Ranjita v. State, in Appeal No. 152 of 1957, d/- 14-2-1958 (Raj), lay down the correct law on the following matters : (1) Whether it is necessary that entries should be made in the various police records of the pre cautions that were to be taken for keeping the accused person ba-parda while under police custody; (2) Whether it should be specified in the warrant of commitment of the accused, when he is sent to the judicial custody that he is to be kept ba-parda till the identification parade takes place, and what precautions should the jail authorities take for keeping the accused ba-parda. (3) Whether necessarily-entries should be made in the jail records for keeping the accused ba-parda while he is in the judicial lock up. " In making the reference, the Bench was of the opinion that the above questions were of vital importance and arose for consideration in a large number of cases; and since from time to time the observations made in those cases had led






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top