SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(Raj) 196

I.N.MODI
SAMDUKHAN – Appellant
Versus
MADANLAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Vallabh Lal

Judgment


I. N. MODI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application by Samdukhan appellant in S. B. Civil Miscellaneous appeal No. 28 of 1958 praying that his recognised agent Mr. Hafi-zullah be permitted as a special case to plead before this Court, the main reason for the prayer being that the former is too poor to engage a counsel to argue his case. The application is an omnibus one and covers a similar request with respect to several other cases of the petitioner, which are not before me and to that extent it seems to me to be entirely misconceived. In deciding this application, therefore, I shall confine myself to the particular appeal which is before me.

( 2 ) BEFORE proceeding further, it may be mentioned that the particular attorney with respect to whom the present application has been made is a revenue agent, and it is pointed out that he has been practising before all the revenue Courts in this state. I may, however, state at once that that is a matter governed by separate rules with which I am not concerned in the present case, and, therefore, that circumstance has scarcely any relevance for the determination of the point that is raised before me. The point to decide is whether Mr. Ha














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top