SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(Raj) 169

K.L.BAPNA, I.N.MODI
MANSINGH – Appellant
Versus
MEWAR TEXTILE MILLS LTD. , BHILWARA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Kistoor Mal Singhavi

Judgment


K. L. BAPNA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution.

( 2 ) THE case set out by Mansingh petitioner is that he was an employee of the mewar Textile Mills Ltd. Bhilwara, as a sepoy, and his duty on the night between the 29th and 30th September, 1957, was to supervise the Chowkidars from 2 a. m. to 6 a. m. A theft took place on that night at the mills premises. The petitioner along with certain other Chowkidars were suspended and an inquiry was held by the Manager of the Mill. His finding was that the petitioner and certain other Chowkidars were negligent in their duty. It was found that the theft was committed either by the Sepoys or it could be attributed to their gross negligence. Taking into consideration the previous conduct of the petitioner, the management directed his dismissal from the date of his suspension, that is, 1-10-1957. The management offered one months pay as required by Section 33 (2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and an application seeking approval of the action taken by the management was made to the Industrial Tribunal. The Industrial Tribunal by an order dated 30-11-1947, affirmed the decision taken against the p






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top