SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(Raj) 202

High Court Of Rajasthan
Judgename : Wanchoo,Dave
DALELSINGH - Appellant
Versus
TEHSILDAR OF CHHOTI SADRI - Respondent
Civil Writ Case 107 Of 1956
Decided On : 09/12/1957

Advocates Appeared:
KANSINGH, U.M.TRIVEDI

A Panchayat comes into existence after the oath of office is taken by the Panch and Sarpanch. A notification under Section 14 of the Rajasthan Panchayat Act, 1953 is not the sine qua non without which the Panchayat cannot come into existence.

Headnote:

PANCHAYAT - NOTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 14 OF RAJASTHAN PANCHAYAT ACT, 1953 - MANDATORY - PANCHAYAT COMES INTO EXISTENCE AFTER OATH OF OFFICE TAKEN BY PANCH AND SARPANCH - NOTIFICATION NOT SINE QUA NON FOR PANCHAYAT'S EXISTENCE - SECTION 14 READ WITH SECTIONS 15 AND 17(2) AND (3) - ABSENCE FROM MEETINGS WITHOUT INFORMATION - DISQUALIFICATION UNDER SECTION 17(2) INCURRED BEFORE NOTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 14 - BY-ELECTION RIGHTLY ORDERED.

Fact of the Case:

The applicant, Dalelsingh, was elected Sarpanch of the Gram Panchayat of Samarthali in December 1955. He took the oath of office on 9th December 1955. Thereafter, there were a number of meetings of the Panchayat from 30-1-1956 to 21-5-1956. The applicant was continuously absent from these meetings. The applicant was arrested on 5-1-1956 in connection with Bhooswami agitation and was sentenced to imprisonment and was only released from Jail on 22-5-1956. A by-election was ordered to be held in August 1956 on the ground that the applicant's seat had become vacant under section 17 (2) of the Act.

Finding of the Court:

The Court held that Section 14 of the Act is mandatory for certain purposes, but it cannot be read to lay down that until a notification thereunder is made, the Panchayat cannot come into existence. The Court further held that it is Section 15 which lays down when a Panchayat comes into existence and that a notification under Section 14 is not the sine qua non without which the Panchayat cannot come into existence. The Court found that the applicant had incurred the disqualification under Section 17 (2) even before 16-6-1956 when the notification under Section 14 was published.

Issues: 1. Whether a notification under Section 14 of the Rajasthan Panchayat Act, 1953 is mandatory or directory? 2. Whether a Panchayat comes into existence only after a notification under Section 14 is issued? 3. Whether the applicant had incurred the disqualification under Section 17 (2) before the notification under Section 14 was published?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. Section 14 of the Act is mandatory for certain purposes, but it cannot be read to lay down that until a notification thereunder is made, the Panchayat cannot come into existence. 2. A Panchayat comes into existence after the oath of office is taken by the Panch and Sarpanch. A notification under Section 14 is not the sine qua non without which the Panchayat cannot come into existence. 3. The applicant had incurred the disqualification under Section 17 (2) even before the notification under Section 14 was published.

Final Decision: The petition was dismissed.

Judgment


WANCHOO, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application by Dalelsingh under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the holding of a by-election lor the office of Sarpanch of Gram panchayat of Samarthali on the ground that the seat of the applicant, who had elected barpanch in December 1955, had become vacant.

( 2 ) THE case of the applicant is briefly this. He was elected Sarpanch of the Gram panchayat of Samarthali in December 1955. The result of the election was notified in accordance with Section 14 of the Rajasthan Panchayat Act, 1953 (Act No. 21 of 1953) (hereinafter called the Act) on 16th of June 1956. The applicant says that thereafter he went to the Tehsildar to take the oath of office, as required by section 15 of the Act. He was then told that his seat had become vacant under section 17 (2) of the Act and a by-election had been ordered to be held in August 1956. Consequently, the applicant made the present application challenging the holding of the by-election on the ground that his seat had become vacant.

( 3 ) THE main ground on which the applicant contends that his seat had not become vacant is that the Panchayat can only come into being after the notification under section 14 has been issued and as this notification was issued in June 1956, he could not incur any disqualification if unauthorised meetings of the Panchayat were held between December 1955 and June 1956. He, therefore, prays that the Court should direct that his seat had not become vacant and that no by-election should be held.

3a. The application has been opposed on behalf of the State. The State contends that the provision of Section 14 of the Act is only directory and the Panchayat can function as such even before the names of the Panchas are published under section 14. It is also said that oath was administered to the applicant and other panchas by the Tehsildar on 9th of December 1955 immediately after the election. The Panchayat thus came into existence after the administration of the oath and was functioning thereafter and a number of meetings were held, The applicant was continuously absent from these meetings numbering more than five between 30th of January 1956 and 21st of May 1956 "without giving any information to the panchayat and, therefore, his seat became vacant under Section 17 (2) and consequently, by-election had to be ordered. It is also said that the reason why the applicant absented himself was that he had been arrested on 5-1-1956 in connection with Bhooswami agitation and was sentenced to imprisonment and was only released from Jail on 22-5-1956. Apparently, he sent no information from Jail to the Panchayat that he could not attend the meetings.

( 4 ) THE main question which falls for consideration in this case is whether a notification under Section 14 of the Act is necessary before a Pancnayat can start functioning. We may, in this connection, refer to the following sections of the Act:

"14. Every election or appointment of a Sarpanch, Upsarpanch and a panch shall be notified in the Rajasthan Gazettee in accordance with rules made under this Act.

15. Every Panch or Sarpanch shall, as soon as possible after his election or appointment, as the case may be, make in the prescribed manner the prescribed oath or affirmation of his office and, unless this is done, shall not perform any of his functions under this Act. 17 (2) If any Panch, Sarpanch or Upsarpanch during the term of his office, absents himself from five consecutive meetings of the Panchayat without giving information in writing to the Panchayat he shall cease to be such Panch, Sarpanch, or Upsarpanch and his seat shall become vacant. (3) If any Panch or Sarpanch fails to make the prescribed oath or affirmation of his office within three months from the date of notification under Section 14, his seat shall be declared by the State Government to have become vacant. "

( 5 ) WE may also here refer to certain rules which have a bearing on the point raised before us. R













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top