SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(Raj) 201

D.S.DAVE, I.N.MODI
NARSINGH DASS – Appellant
Versus
MOOL RAJ – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.T.Porwal

Judgment


D. S. DAVE, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application in revision against the order of the District Judge, jodhpur, dated 27-7-1957, and arises in the following circumstances:

( 2 ) THE petitioner wanted to file an appeal in the court of the learned District Judge, jodhpur, against the judgment and decree passed against him by the Civil Judge, jodhpur, on 17-12-1956, in a money suit. The petitioner presented an application for leave to file an appeal in forma pauperis. The appellate court ordered a notice to be issued to the respondents. When that application came before the court on 27-7-57, it was submitted by the non-applicants that since the decree was not contrary to law or some usage having the force of law or otherwise erroneous or unjust, it should be dismissed under the proviso to Order 44, R, 1, C. P. C. This argument found favour with the learned District Judge and he dismissed the petitioners application for permission to appeal in forma pauperis. It is against this order that the present revision application has been filed.

( 3 ) LEARNED counsel for the applicant has urged that the appellate court could reject his application under the proviso to Order 44, Rule 1 at th



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top