SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(Raj) 287

K.N.WANCHOO, K.L.BAPNA, D.M.BHANDARI
HANUMAN PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.A.GUPTA, R.C.SHARMA

Judgment


K. L. BAPNA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a reference under Section 57 of the Indian Stamp Act.

( 2 ) ON 11th September, 1951 Seth Hanuman Prasad presented the following document for registration : "declaration regarding gift of Rupees three lacs from Shri Murlidhar mansinghka to Shri Hanuman Prasad Murlidhar Mansinghka. " we Murlidhar Mansinghka and Hanuman Prasad Murlidhar at present residing at bhilwara (Rajasthan State) respectively solemnly affirm and say as follows :.

"i, Murlidhar Mansinghka for myself say that my son Hanuman Prasad has completed the age of 18 years. With a view to assist him in carrying on his own business, I have out of natural love and affection which I bear towards him made a gift to him of the sum of Rupees three lacs which amount was paid to him on my account by a Hundi drawn by me on Shri Mansinghka Oil Mills Ltd. , Bombay in favour of my son Hanuman prasad. My son Hanuman Prasad has received the sum of Rupees three lacs from Shri Mansinghka Oil Mills Ltd. , Bombay on 8th day of september, 1951, The said sum of Rupees three lacs is my separate and self acquired property and I have every right to dispose of the same in such manner as I think fit. I, Han

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top