SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(Raj) 254

I.N.MODI, K.N.WANCHOO
JASWANTSINGH – Appellant
Versus
ASSISTANT JUDGE, MAHSANA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMARCHAND, B.P.BERI, L.N.Chhangani

Judgment


K. N. WANCHOO, C. J.

( 1 ) THESE are two connected writs by the Divisional Personnel Officer of the western Railway at Aimer under Article 226 of the Constitution praying for a writ of certiorari in connection with a matter under the Payment of Wages Act. The applications were originally filed in the High Court of Bombay and have come to this Court under Section 64 (2) of the States Reorganization Act, 1956.

( 2 ) IT is not necessary for present purposes to set out in detail the case of the parties. Suffice it to say that an application was made by Bal Krishna Maheshwari, opposite Party No. 3, who was in the service of the Western Railway at Abu Road, on 7-7-1952 under the Payment of Wages Act before the Authority having jurisdiction in the matter viz. the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Abu Road, Balkrishna maheshwari claimed that his wages had been illegally deducted and prayed for relief under section 15 of the Payment of Wages Act. The matter was enquired into by the Authority concerned and an order in favour of balkrishna Maheshwari was passed on 30-4-1954. Thereupon there was an appeal to the District Court at Mehsana under Section 17 of the Payment of Wages Act which













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top