SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Raj) 54

BHANDARI, WANCHOO
STATE – Appellant
Versus
BABULAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.K.Bhargava, M.M.TIVARI

Judgment


WANCHOO, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS is a reference by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate of Fatehpur under Section 432, Criminal P. C. The question raised before him was that the Police Act (5 of 1861) was not legally enforced in Rajasthan. He has, therefore, referred the question whether the Police Act (5 of 1861) is legally enforced in Rajasthan and is thus a valid piece of legislation in Rajasthan.

( 2 ) A preliminary objection has been taken on behalf of the State that the reference is invalid as the Sub-Divisional Magistrate has not said in so many words that his opinion is that the Act is not legally enforced and is not a valid piece of legislation so far as Rajasthan is concerned. There is no doubt that he has not said so in so many words, but a reading of his reference order shows that he was inclined that way and under these circumstances, we over-rule the preliminary objection.

( 3 ) THE manner in which the Police Act (5 of 1861) came to be applied to Rajasthan is this : On 24-1-1950 the Rajasthan Adaptation of Central Laws Ordinance (4 of 1950) was promulgated by His Highness the Rajpramukh. A number of Central acts were adapted to Rajasthan by virtue of Section 3 of the Ord







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top