SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Raj) 169

WANCHOO, BAPNA
PRABHUDAYAL – Appellant
Versus
CHIEF PANCHAYAT OFFICER, JAIPUR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.A.GUPTA, S.C.AGARWAL, V.P.TYAGI

Judgment


WANCHOO, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application by Prabhudayal under Article 226 of the Constitution for a writ direction or order in connection with the election of Malharna Dungar panchayat.

( 2 ) THE applicants case is that the election for the Panchayat at Malharna Dungar was fixed for the 20th of October, 1954, under Rule 4 of the Rajasthan Panchayat election Rules, 1954, the returning officer has, at least 7 days before the date of election, to announce for the information of the inhabitants of the Panchayat Circle by notice and in such/other manner as the Chief Panchayab Officer may direct the number and names of wards, if any, the number of Panchas to be elected from each ward and from the entire Panchayati Circle and the date, time and place of election. The applicant submits that the Returning Officer did not comply with Rule 4, inasmuch as he issued the notice under Rule 4 on the 18th of October, 1954. The applicant raised certain other points which, however we do not consider it necessary to set out for purposes of this case.

( 3 ) THE application has been opposed by the opposite parties, and the reply with respect to compliance with R. 4 is this. It is admitted







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top