SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(Raj) 201

WANCHOO, DAVE
MEGHRAJ – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BALA KISHAN PARIK, Chandmal, CHUNILAL, JEETMAL, L.N.Chhangani, M.L.Joshi, MUKANDAS

Judgment


WANCHOO, C. J.

( 1 ) THESE are four connected applications under Article 226 o the Constitution by meghraj (No. 22), Mukandas (No 28), Jeetmal (No. 98) and Chunnilal (No. 243 ). As the main points raised in them are the same, we propose to decide them by one judgment.

( 2 ) OF the four applicants, Meghraj was a, male nurse in M. T. B. Hospital, Bari (Udaipur), while the other three were male nurses at the Mahatma Gandhi Hospital jodhpur. They were dismissed on various dates in 1952. Their appeals were also dismissed in 1954. Thereafter, the present applications were filed, and the order of dismissal was challenged.

( 3 ) TWO main points have been, raised by the applicants in their applications. The first is that there was no rule in the Government Servants Conduct Rules which prohibited strikes by Government servants. Therefore, even if the applicants went on strike, they could not be dismissed from service on that ground, and, in any case, the order of the Director of Medical and Health Services dismissing, them for contravening Rule 21 of the Government Servants Conduct Rules could not be sustained for the applicants did not commit any breach of that rule. The second










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top