SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Raj) 1348

JAGDISH BHALLA, PRAKASH TATIA
Pat Ram – Appellant
Versus
Board of Revenue – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
J.R. Beniwal, for Appellants;
S.N. Trivedi, Hemant Choudhary, for Respondents

Hon'ble TATIA, J.—The writ petitioners' suit for declaration of Khatedari right for the agricultural land, referred in the suit, was dismissed by the trial Court, holding it as barred by principle of res judicata under Section 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, vide judgment and decree dated 21.5.1999. The writ petitioners' appeal against the said order was dismissed by the Revenue Appellate Authority, Hanumangarh vide order dated 23.6.2000 and second appeal too was dismissed by the Board of Revenue vide order dated 12.9.2000. Then the petitioners have preferred S.B.Civil Writ Petition No. 3985/2000 which was dismissed in limine by the learned Single Judge vide impugned order dated 8.11.2000. Hence this special appeal.

2. The facts which are not in dispute are that petitioners' predecessor Rati Ram submitted an application before the Sub-Divisional Officer, Nohar alleging that the land in dispute was allotted to him by the Assistant Collector by the order 20.10.1951 for the reason that he was kotwal of the village. However, this fact was disputed by respondents' predecessor Ishar and Rati Ram's application was rejected by the Sub-Divisional Officer by order dated 8.7.1968 and the ap








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top