H.L.DATTU, DALVEER BHANDARI
Shyam Lal @ Kuldeep – Appellant
Versus
Sanjeev Kumar – Respondent
2. The appellant herein, who was the plaintiff before the Trial Court, filed a suit for declaration to the effect that mutation number 1313 dated 20.2.1988 in favour of defendant nos.1 and 2 was illegal, null and void. The plaintiff and defendant nos.3 and 4 are the sons and defendant nos.5 and 6 are the daughters of late Shri Balak Ram. They were joint owners and in possession of the estate of the deceased Balak Ram in equal shares. Balak Ram died on 31.10.1987. After his death, his estate came to be mutated in favour of his grandsons, defendant nos.1 and 2, on the basis of a Will executed on 4.12.1978, vide mutation number 1313 dated 20.02.1988.
3. According to the plaintiff, the estate was inherited by the deceased Balak Ram from his father Mohar Singh and as such the same was ancestral in his hands. It is further alleged by the plaintiff that the deceased Balak Ram’s Hin
Perumal Nadar (dead) by Legal Representative vs. Ponnuswami Nadar (minor) (AIR 1971 SC 2352) 16
Badri Prasad vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation & Ors. (AIR 1978 SC 1557) 17
Goutam Kundu vs. State of W.B. & Anr. (AIR 1993 SC 2295) 18
Raghunath Parmeshwar Panditrao Mali & Anr. vs. Eknath Gajanan Kulkarni & Anr. ((1996) 7 SCC 681) 19
S.P.S. Balasubramaniyam vs. Suruttayan @ Andalipadayachi & Ors. (1994(1) SCC 460) 19
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.