G.K.TIWARI, RAKESH HOOJA
Murti Mandir – Appellant
Versus
Phelu – Respondent
2. Briefly stated, the facts leading to the appeal are that the respondent-plaintiff filed a suit against the deity Murti Mandir Shri Jugal Kishore Ji Maharaj (appellant-defendant) for declaration of sub-tenancy rights in the disputed lands which stand in the khatedari right of the deity. The trial Court of Sub-Divisional Officer Gangapurcity after hearing rival parties dismissed the suit by his judgment and decree dated 29.9.05 which was challenged by the respondent plaintiff through an appeal under Section 223 of the Act before Revenue Appellate Authority Sawai Madhopur who set aside the judgment and decree dated 29.9.05 of Sub-Divisional Officer Gangapurcity and remanded the case by his judgment dated 13.9.06 to the trial Court for re-hearing and re-decision. Aggrieved against the impugned remand order of Revenue Appellate Authority Sawai Madhopur the instant appeal under Section 225 of the Act is filed before us.
3. We have heard the learned counsels of both the parties.
4. The learned counsel
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.