2009 Supreme(Raj) 1022
R.S.CHAUHAN
Pali Ram Charitable Trust Surajgarh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
Advocates Appeared
Paras Kuhad with Sunil Nath, Ghanshyam S. Sisodia and Achintya Kaushik, for Petitioner;
Dinesh Yadav, Addl. Advocate General, for State
Hon'ble CHAUHAN, J.—Before entering into the battlefield of Kurukshetra, the Pandavs had pleaded for grant of only five villages in their favour. The plea was contemptuously dismissed by the blind King of Hastinapur, Dhritrastra. Similarly in this case, the petitioner and its predecessorin-interest have been running from pillar to post pleading that the land which was bought by Seth Pali Ram and Brij Lal, respondents No.4 and 5, in 1942 and which was subsequently transferred to the petitioner Trust, should be registered in the revenue records in favour of the Trust. Despite a labyrinth of litigations, inspite of its chequered history, the petitioner is hopelessly hoping that justice would be done to it. Like a voice in the wilderness, the petitioner has floated in the corridors and courtrooms with a glimmer of hope that someone some day would hear its pleas. Like the Pandavs, the petitioner is still out in the legal wilderness.
2. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 25.4.2003 passed by the Board of Revenue (`the Board' for short), whereby a reference made by the Additional Collector, Jhunjhunu has been accepted. The learned Board has cancelled the mutation made in favour o
Click Here to Read the rest of this document