SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Raj) 310

PAWAN CHANDRA
Kailash – Appellant
Versus
Ghansi Ram – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Yogendra Singh and Mukesh Jain, for Petitioners;
Vijay Soni, for Respondent No.1;
Bijendra Choudhary, Dy. Govt. Advocate, for State

JUDGMENT

ih- pUnz] lnL;-&izkFkhZx.k tks fd ewy izdj.k ds jsLiks.MsUV gSa] us ;g fuxjkuh vUrxZr /kkjk 84 jktLFkku Hkw jktLo vf/kfu;e] 1956 ds rgr laHkkxh; vk;qDr] t;iqj ds fu.kZ; fnukad 6-5-2009 ,oa vfrfjDr ftyk dysDVj] dksViqryh ds fu.kZ; fnukad 11-4-2007 ls O;fFkr gksdj izLrqr dh gSA

2- izdj.k ds la{ksi esa rF; bl izdkj gS fd foi{kh la[;k 1 ?kUlhjke us ,d vihy vfrfjDr ftyk dysDVj] dksViqryh ftyk t;iqj ds le{k xzke cklMh rglhy dksViqryh ls lEcfU/kr ifj'kks/ku i= la[;k 4 fnukad 19-1-1983 ds lEcU/k esa fnukad 24-5-2004 dks izLrqr dj mDr ifj'kks/ku i= dks fof/k fo:) ,oa U;k; ds izkd`frd fl)kUrksa ds foijhr gksus ds dkj.k fujLr djus dh izkFkZuk dh rFkk mlds i{k esa oknxzLr vkjkth ds 1@3 fgLls dk ukekUrjdj.k [kksys tkus dh izkFkZuk dhA mUgksaus bl vihy ds lkFk /kkjk 5 fe;kn vf/kfu;e ds rgr Hkh izkFkZuk i= ,oa 'kiFk i= izLrqr fd;k gSA mDr vihy dks vfrfjDr ftyk dysDVj us vius fu.kZ; fnukad 2-6-2004 ls Lohdkj dj fy;kA bl fu.kZ; ds fo:) izkFkhZx.k dSyk'kpUn] jkes'oj ,oa izgykn us /kkjk 86 jktLFkku Hkw-jktLo vf/kfu;e lifBr vkns'k 47 fu;e 1 ,oa /kkjk 151 lhihlh ds rgr iqufoZyksdu dk izkFkZuk i= izLrqr fd;k ftls mUgksaus vius fu.kZ; fnukad 7-7-2004 vuqlkj Lohdkj djrs gq, muds Lo; ds }kjk ikfjr f

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top