SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Raj) 648

TARA CHAND SAHARAN
Dhannalal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Sampatlal Bohra, for Appellant;
O.P. Bhatt, Dy.G.A.

JUDGMENT

lgkj.k] lnL;-&;g vihy jktLFkku Hkw jktLo vf/kfu;e] 1956 ¼la{ksi esa ^vf/kfu;e 1956*½ ds vUrxZr Hkw izcU/k vf/kdkjh ,oa insu jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] mn;iqj ds fu.kZ; fnukad 18-2-2008 ds fo:) izLrqr dh xbZ gSA

2- izdj.k ds rF; la{ksi esa bl izdkj gS fd /kUukyky us xzke fiijMk rglhy jktleUn dh vkjkth uEcj 3539@22 jdck 18 fcLok esa ls 14 fcLok 10 fcLokalh vFkkZr 1174 oxZehVj Hkwfe ds okf.kfT;d iz;kstukFkZ laifjorZu ds fy, jktLFkku Hkw jktLo ¼xzkeh.k {ks=ksa esa d`f"k Hkwfe dk vd`f"k iz;kstuksa ds fy, laifjorZu½] fu;e] 1992 ¼la{ksi esa ^fu;e 1992*½ ds vUrxZr ,d izkFkZuk i= mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] jktleUn ds U;k;ky; esa izLrqr fd;kA izLrqr izkFkZuk i= dh rglhynkj] jktleUn ls tkap djokbZ xbZA ftlesa ftrsUnz dqekj firk ukuqjke [kVhd fuoklh dqekjh;k [ksMk rglhy ukFk}kjk ,d f'kdk;r izkFkZuk i= izLrqr dj fuosnu fd;k x;k fd /kUukyky dh 18 fcLok Hkwfe ,oa mldh [kkrsnkjh dh 8 fcLok Hkwfe ij }kjds'k ekcZy dk xksMkmu py jgk gSA /kUUkkyky >wBh tkudkjh nsdj xSj dkuwuh rjhds ls Hkwfe dk okf.kfT;d :ikarj.k djus dh dksf'k'k dj jgk gSA rglhynkj us tkap esa crk;k fd vkjkth uEcj 3539@22 jdck 0-18 fcLok Hkwfe /kUUkkyky firk :iyky ds uke ntZ gS rFkk vkjkth la[;k 3539@21 jdck 8 fcLok ukuwjke firk fd'kksj [kVh






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top